![]() |
||
|
|
NIGERIA | |
|
Web:
|
began campaigning for the introduction of full Shar'ia (Islamic) law. Today 12 of Nigeria’s 36 states have either adopted a Shar'ia penal code or are in the process of doing so. This has occurred in spite of the fact that the Federal Constitution of Nigeria expressly forbids the establishment of state religion, and the creation of laws that are applicable solely to a par- ticular gender, religion, tribe or regional grouping. Shar'ia as practiced by northern states has created a socio-political climate conducive to gender dis- crimination of varying degrees of severity. At one end of the spectrum, in some states women can no longer travel in mixed-sex public transport and must dress according to Islamic strictures. At the other, in cases involving sexual offenses, women usually receive severe sentences from Islamic courts, while the men they were involved with tend to go unpunished.
|
|
|
The first case to highlight the prevalence of gender discrimination gained international attention due to the age of the person concerned and the severity of the punishment imposed. This involved Bariya Ibrahim Maguzu, a Muslim teenager from Zamfara, who gave birth to a child after being forced by her father to have sex with 3 men. Islamic law states that the testimony of a woman is inadequate in such cases, and that such a charge can only be proved against a man if there are four male witnesses to the event. The girl was sentenced to 180 lashes, 80 of which were added because she was deemed to have 'falsely accused' the three men involved. The sentence was carried out despite the fact that an appeal was pending. She was also obliged to marry one of several men who had later volun- teered to become her husband. There have since been two similar cases involving pregnant teenagers from Bauchi and Katsina States respectively. The girl from Bauchi was unable to produce four witnesses and received 100 lashes. In the Katsina case, both the girl and the 24-year old man involved received 100 lashes. However, the case that gained the most national and international attention was that of Safiya Hussaini Tungar Tudu, a middle-aged divorcee from Sokoto State who was sentenced to death by stoning for bearing a child out of wedlock. Safiya contended that she had been raped, but charges against the alleged rapist were dropped when he denied responsibility and the defendant was unable to produce the prerequisite four wit- nesses to testify to his guilt. A Shar'ia appeal court in Sokoto State eventually acquitted Safiya on March 19, 2002 following an international outcry. "Amina Lawal" The latest case to gain international attention involves Amina Lawal, a 30 year old from Kurami village in Katsina State. Amina is a farmer's daughter and a mother of three who has been married twice since the age of 14. Following her second divorce in the latter part of 2000 Amina embarked on a relationship with a local man, Yahaya Mohammed, whom she says had promised to marry her if she consented to a physical relationship. She subsequently gave birth out of wedlock to her third child, a baby daughter named Wasila who was born in November 2001. After the birth of Wasila, Amina was taken to a lower Shar'ia court in Bakori, Katsina on March 4, 2002 by her fellow villagers. According to the system of Shar'ia practiced in Katsina, a divorced woman is guilty of adultery (Zina) even if the man she is involved with is unmarried, and the mere fact that Amina had given birth satisfied the Shar'ia court judge of her guilt. Consequently on March 19, 2002, Amina received the mandatory sentence of death by stoning. For his part Yahaya Mohammed admitted knowing Amina, but denied having had a physical relation- ship with her. Since Amina had no male witnesses to back up her assertions, Yahaya was acquitted due to insufficient evidence after swearing to his innocence on the Qur’an. Amina took her case to a Shar'ia appeal court in Funtua, Katsina, with the help of human rights organizations. According to Musa Aliyu Yawuri, her current defense lawyer, Amina had no legal representation at her initial trial. Moreover, her alleged offense was not explained to her in terms that she could understand. The judges and the prosecution had used the term Zina, an Arabic word that Amina, being a Hausa, did not fully comprehend. In a desperate effort to save her life the defense further contended that Amina’s former husband had fathered the child, and that the fetus had lain dormant for a two-year period. The defense was attempting to utilize a loophole found in certain ver- sions of Shar'ia law that allows a divorced woman to bear her ex-husband's child within a period that can extend to seven years subsequent to the divorce. ( In January 2002, 17-year-old Hafsatu Abubakar from Sokoto was acquitted of adultery charges after using this very strategy.) Amina’s defense team concluded by arguing that even if she had had a physical relationship with another man subsequent to her divorce, this would have occurred prior to June 2001, the date that Katsina State formally adopted the Shar'ia penal code. Amina's appeal first came up on June 3, 2002. At that time the presiding judge adjourned the case but also ruled that the sentence would be suspended for 18 months regardless of the outcome of the appeal in order to give Amina time to wean her daughter. The case was adjourned until October 19th, at which time the Funtua Shar'ia Court upheld the initial sentence. There are now plans to mount an appeal to an even higher Shar'ia Court, and, if that fails, to the Supreme Court of the Fed- eral Republic of Nigeria. If all of these appeals fail, then Amina may face execution at any time after December 2003. What Can I Do? |
||
| © Christian Solidarity Worldwide 2002 | ||